Fig 1.
Theoretical model of the study adopted from POET model.
Fig 2.
Geographical position of the research areas.
Table 1.
Results of ecological indicators including BC, EF, BC/EF and the ranks of studied villages in Fars province.
Fig 3.
Total ecological deficit (BC-EF) of the villages.
Ecological deficit refers to the amount of EF that higher than BC of the region.
Table 2.
Results of BC/EF ratio index of cropland and grazing land of villages in Fars province.
Fig 4.
Ecological deficit (BC-EF) of cropland category of the villages.
Ecological deficit refers to the amount of EF that higher than BC of the region.
Fig 5.
Ecological deficit (BC-EF) of grazing land category of the villages.
Ecological deficit refers to the amount of EF that higher than BC of the region.
Fig 6.
Total BC and EF of the service centers in Fars province.
Table 3.
The BC/EF ratio index and ecological deficit of the service centers in Fars province.
Fig 7.
BC and EF of cropland of the service centers in Fars province.
Fig 8.
BC and EF of grazing land of the service centers in Fars province.
Fig 9.
Total BC and EF of the counties in Fars province.
Table 4.
The BC/EF ratio index and ecological deficit of the counties in Fars province.
Fig 10.
BC and EF of cropland of the counties in Fars province.
Fig 11.
BC and EF of grazing land of the counties in Fars province.
Table 5.
ANOVA results of comparison of triple villages groups regarding the variable research in theoretical model.
Fig 12.
Casual model of factors influencing ecological index.
Table 6.
Path results, direct and indirect effects of variables on ecological index.
Fig 13.
Priority of different environmental management paradigms for sustainable agriculture as perceived by AEOAJ.
Fig 14.
Priority of different environmental management paradigms for sustainable agriculture as perceived by AOAJ.
Table 7.
Summary of results for AHP analysis about effects of environmental management models in two managerial groups.
Table 8.
Prioritizing and ranking of the criteria for sustainable agricultural development (AEOAJ).
Table 9.
Prioritizing and ranking of the criteria for sustainable agricultural development (AOAJ).