Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Examples of extrinsic and intrinsic bivariate encoding of geographic variables.

EN1: extrinsic (separable) encoding of variables according to size and color lightness; EN2: mental representation of extrinsic visualization (all the possibilities); IN: intrinsic (inseparable) encoding of variables according to hue and lightness.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Examples of extrinsic visualization (left) and intrinsic visualization (right) used in the study. Legends for both extrinsic and intrinsic visualization are also given. Areas with identical values are depicted with two different encoding systems to enable a visual comparison of the differences between each visualization.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Example of an intrinsic visualization item (subtest A–part A.1.).

The task was to select the area which contained “medium soil depth”; the correct answer was area No. 1.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Example of an extrinsic visualization item (subtest B—part B.2).

The task was to select the area which best satisfied the conditions of “low soil depth” and “medium soil moisture”; the correct answer was area No. 3.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Between-subject experimental design (subtests A and B; parts A.1, A.2, B.1 and B.2).

Both independent experimental groups, Intrinsic and Extrinsic, performed the test in exactly the same manner. The order of all items was constant for both groups, and all participants.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Response correctness for the entire test.

Correctness was calculated as a ratio of the number of correct answers to the number of all answers.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Error rate per item.

INT–red/yellow, EXT–blue. Particular attention was given to items with a significant difference between the two visualizations (1, 2, 9, 21, 28). The error rate was calculated as a percentage of incorrect answers of all answers.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Mean response time per extrinsic/intrinsic visualizations (calculated from the response times to all extrinsic/intrinsic items for all participants).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 1.

Response times for the individual subtest parts (ms).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 9.

Mean response time (ms) per item (calculated for the individual subtest levels).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Mean response times (ms) per individual items for extrinsic and intrinsic visualization (all items).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of AOI dwell times (ms).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 11.

Mean AOI dwell time per extrinsic/intrinsic group (ms).

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Dwell time on AOI (%) for the extrinsic visualization (top) and intrinsic visualization (bottom). Extrinsic visualization–proportion of dwell time at AOI in single items; (top); Intrinsic visualization–proportion of dwell time at AOI in single items (bottom).

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Ratio of the direct map-to-legend/legend-to-map saccades to the total number of direct saccades (%) between the defined AOI (instructions, legend, map, button bar).

More »

Fig 13 Expand