Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Forest dependent threatened and Near Threatened species with CT as a recommended conservation action on the IUCN Red List.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Overlapping species’ range maps for 152 threatened and Near Threatened terrestrial species, amphibians, birds, mammals, that live in forest habitat with CT as a recommended conservation action.

Reprinted partially from the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) under a CC BY license, with permission from ESRI, original copyright 2021.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Overlapping species range maps with restoration potential for 152 threatened and Near Threatened terrestrial species, amphibians, birds, mammals, that live in forest habitat with CT as a recommended conservation action.

Areas in grey indicate where restoration species’ home ranges exist, but there is no potential for habitat restoration. White areas indicate where no species with recommended CT occur. Reprinted partially from the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) under a CC BY license, with permission from ESRI, original copyright 2021.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

The area within each country with 4 or more species that have overlapping ranges and habitat restoration potential.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Habitat protection and quality differences for species with reintroduction and benign introduction recommended.

Differences in the median percent of species’ ranges within a protected area and the percent of species recommended for habitat restoration and invasive species control. A Mann-Whitney U test revealed the distributions of species range percentage within a protected area was significantly different for reintroductions (n = 115) and benign introductions (n = 37) (p = 0.044). A Chi-square test of independence revealed benign introductions were recommended for invasive species control significantly more than expected (χ2 = 5.9405, df = 1, p = 0.015), but no significant differences between CT category and species recommended for habitat restoration (χ2 = 3.4833, df = 1, p = 0.062).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Overlapping species range maps for 68 threatened and Near Threatened terrestrial species, amphibians, birds, mammals, that live in forest habitat without a CT program in-place.

Reprinted partially from the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) under a CC BY license, with permission from ESRI, original copyright 2021.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Overlapping species range maps with restoration potential for 68 threatened and Near Threatened terrestrial species, amphibians, birds, mammals, that live in forest habitat without a CT program in-place.

Areas in grey indicate where restoration species’ home ranges exist, but there is no potential for habitat restoration. White areas indicate where no species with recommended CT occur. Reprinted partially from the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) under a CC BY license, with permission from ESRI, original copyright 2021.

More »

Fig 5 Expand