Fig 1.
m is the Spectral Absorption Peak; S1 and S2 are Shoulders; λ is the Corresponding Wavelength; ρ is the Spectral Reflectance.
Fig 2.
Typical reflectance spectrum of the sample (three absorption bands and nonabsorption baselines).
Table 1.
Spectral reflectance indices to estimate the water content and related source references.
Fig 3.
Leaf EWT (g cm−2) and FMC (%) of the three plant species.
Table 2.
Statistics of the leaf EWT and FMC for the samples.
Fig 4.
Relationships between the measured EWT and SAI1200 (left)/RATIO1200 (right) for the pooled data.
Table 3.
Performance of the regression models in estimating the leaf equivalent thickness (EWT, g cm−2).
Fig 5.
Relationships between the measured leaf FMC and SAI1660 (left)/RDI (right) for the pooled data.
Table 4.
Performance of the regression models for estimating the leaf FMC (%).
Fig 6.
Plots of the EWT and FMC estimated using RATIO and SAI for the pooled data.
Fig 7.
Relationship between the measured EWT and SAI1200 (left) and RATIO1200 (right) at the species level.
Fig 8.
Relationship between the measured FMC and SAI1660 (left) and RDI (right) at the species level.