Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Architecture of our proposed prediction model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Ensemble classifier with soft voting.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Data extraction from KAMIR-NIH dataset.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Hyperparameter tuning for machine learning algorithms.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Variable divisions as categorical and continuous.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Variable divisions as categorical and continuous.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Baseline characteristics of all subjects (N = 11,189).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Top 10 primary prognostic factors and their feature importance for. (a) RF; (b) ET; (c) GBM.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance measures for machine learning models on complete dataset (%).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Performance measures for machine learning models on STEMI dataset (%).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Performance measures for machine learning models on NSTEMI dataset (%).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Overall evaluation results for prediction of MACE on complete dataset (%).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Evaluation results for prediction of MACE on STEMI dataset (%).

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Evaluation results for prediction of MACE on NSTEMI dataset (%).

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 5.

Normalized confusion matrices for proposed soft voting ensemble classifier on. (a) complete dataset; (b) STEMI dataset; (c) NSTEMI dataset.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 11.

Unpaired t-test results for accuracy between STEMI and NSTEMI groups.

More »

Table 11 Expand