Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Screenshots of the app for assessing eating events and in-the-moment eating happiness.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and correlations of characteristics of in-the-moment experienced eating happiness on the meal level and aggregated per day.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of eating happiness experienced in-the-moment (across 8 days) and at immediate (immediately after EMA) and delayed (after 4 weeks) recall.

Note. Smoothed density distributions show the type of distribution and histograms depict the relative frequency of each response category, while means and standard deviations are depicted as lines above the distribution. For comparison, mean values are connected via a line; *** indicates p ≤ .001.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Magnitude and valence of the memory-experience gap for immediate (a) and delayed (b) recall. Bins represent the number of participants.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Regression results using immediate and delayed recall as the criterion.

Analyses aggregated per day revealed a similar pattern of results as analysis on the meal level.

More »

Table 2 Expand