Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Graph G representing a bi-modal integrated network with the path graph (train network) in orange and the forest (bus network) in blue.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Graph representing a multi-modal integrated network with train (orange links), bus (blue links) and non-motorized modes (red links).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Flowchart of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Synthetic network with 40 nodes.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Number of added NMT links.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Average degree of the augmented network.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Study area.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Potential augmented Gaubus network after adding edges in ENMT.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Average travel speed on the S3 Data Gaubus route near Sandton Gautrain station.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Average travel speed on the S5 Data Gaubus route near Sandton Gautrain station.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Average travel speed on the M3 Gaubus route near Midrand Gautrain station.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Visualisation of cycling trends based on time of the day.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Original network (left) compared to the augmented network obtained with the proposed method (right).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Degree centrality of existing network and augmented network.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Closeness centrality: Existing network (left) and augmented network (right).

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Closeness centrality score: Existing network and augmented network.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Betweenness centrality score: Existing network vs augmented network.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Betweenness centrality: Existing network (left) and augmented network (right).

More »

Fig 18 Expand