Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

A schematic diagram of the image analysis process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

A schematic diagram of the RGB color image structure.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Differential classification of different Chinese cabbage varieties.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Population basic seedling classification.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Population quality classification process in different periods.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Structure of population quality evaluation BPNN model.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Performance comparison results of different algorithms.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Correlation results of image feature values and agricultural parameters.

Note: DW refers to the dry weight of the above-ground portion of the crop, TN represents the number of shoots in the field, LAI is the leaf area index, NC is the leaf area index, SS, RS, and HS stand for the seedling stage, rosette stage, and heading stage, respectively.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Cumulative correlation between each indicator and nitrogen.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Correlation between image color features and various indicators.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Estimation effects of multiple regression model on DW, LAI, TN, and NC.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 2.

Estimation effects of the multiple regression model.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 11.

The relationship between the predicted and actual values of agricultural parameters at different nitrogen levels.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

The correlation between planting density and yield.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

The relationship between agricultural parameters and output in the seedling stage.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

The relationship between agricultural parameters and output in the rosette stage.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

The relationship between agricultural parameters and output in the heading stage.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Population quality evaluation results in the seedling stage.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

BPNN model evaluation results of population quality in different periods.

More »

Fig 17 Expand