Fig 1.
This diagram depicts the inclusion criteria and study selection process [22].
Table 1.
Contrasts included in Deceptive > Honest ALE.
Fig 2.
Deceptive > Honest ALE results.
Activation is visualized in Mango on a standard MNI brain template (A: horizontal slice, B: coronal slice; FWE < 0.001, p < 0.001, at 5,000 permutations). Z and Y values correspond to the brain slice label. The activation color (red-yellow) corresponds to the ALE value listed in Table 2. Left and right are accurately depicted. The ALE image can be found on Neurovault (https://identifiers.org/neurovault.collection:10420).
Table 2.
Deceptive > Honest ALE results.
Fig 3.
Meta-analytic model of connectivity between Deceptive > Honest peak regions.
A: horizontal slice and B: coronal slice. Data were visualized with the BrainNet Viewer [34] (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/). Key (ROI Labels): 1: left insula (L Ins); 2: left superior frontal gyrus (L SFG); 3: right insula (R Ins); 4: right supramarginal gyrus (R SMG); 5: left supramarginal gyrus (L SMG); 6: left medial frontal gyrus (L MFG); 7: right medial frontal gyrus (R MFG). (C) The matrix depicting connectivity from seed regions (left column) to the whole brain (“1” dark blue: bidirectional; “1” light blue: unidirectional; “0”: no direction implied). Each individual MACM (P value map) can be found on Neurovault (https://identifiers.org/neurovault.collection:10420).
Fig 4.
Z-scores of (A) paradigm class or (B) behavioral domain analyses. In the Behavioral Domain panel (B), the Emotion and Interoception domains are abbreviated as “E” and “I” respectively. Only paradigm classes or behavioral sub-domains passing the threshold of z > = 3.0 are depicted.