Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The optimal asset allocation between the S&P500 index and a risk-free asset as a function of the risk-free interest rate rf.

The empirical S&P500 annual returns during 1997–2016 are employed. The bold line shows the optimal allocation to the stock index for a PT investor with the parameters in [23]: α = β = 0.88, λ = 2.25 given by Eq 5. The optimal allocation to the stock index drops dramatically from 100% to 0% once the risk-free rate reaches 0.035. In contrast, for an investor with a logarithmic utility function (thin line) the optimal allocation to the stock decreases gradually with the risk-free rate (note that the allocation is bounded between 0% and 100%, as no borrowing or short-selling are allowed).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

The three tasks in the experiment are given below.

In each task the subject is asked to allocate his investment between the stock and the risk-free bond. Note that the return distributions and risk-free rates in Tasks 2 and 3 are the 2-period and 3-period distributions implied by the 1-period distribution and risk-free rate of Task 1, under the assumption of i.i.d. returns. The detailed experimental procedure is provided below.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Optimal investment proportion in the stock for PT preferences with reference point at the future value of current wealth (W0Rf).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The optimal allocation to the stock in the three tasks for CRRA investors.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The portfolio rate of return distribution for a 2-period horizon, with and without revision of the portfolio weights after the first period.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Asset allocation patterns observed in the experiment.

More »

Table 5 Expand