Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Block-diagram of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison between classification accuracy of methods for two-class problem in dataset IIIa, BCI competition III.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison between classification accuracy of methods for two-class problem in dataset IIa, BCI competition IV.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison between classification accuracy of methods for two-class problem in dataset IVa, BCI competition III.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison between classification accuracy of methods for multi-class problem in dataset IIIa, BCI competition III.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison between classification accuracy of methods for multi-class problem in dataset IIa, BCI competition IV.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Boxplot of all subject for CSP, TRCSP and CCSP in two-class problem.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Boxplot of all subject for CSP, TRCSP and CCSP in multi-class problem.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The scalp topography for the first spatial filter using CSP, TRCSP and CCSP methods for the subjects aw, k3, A06 and A08.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 1.

Mean, median and standard deviation (std.) for two and multi-class problem (Best values are in boldface).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Specificity and sensitivity for all of datasets in two-class problem (Best values are in boldface).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Kappa coefficient for dataset IIIa, BCI competition III and dataset IIa, BCI competition IV in multi-class problem (Best values are in boldface).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Running time for two-class and multi-class problems.

More »

Table 4 Expand