Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The structure of grasp force estimation.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

sEMG armband and its usage diagram.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

sEMG signal and its spectrum.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Grasp force sensor and usage diagram.

(a) Grasp force sensor; (b) Usage diagram of the grasp force sensor.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Parameters of the grasp force sensor.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 5.

Experimental scene and distribution of measurement positions.

(a) Experimental scene; (b) Measurement positions of sEMG signals.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Distribution of the maximum grasp force for each action at each strength level for a subject.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Six channels of sEMG and grasp force.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

sEMG signal measurement positions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 8.

The segmented sEMG signal.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The structure of GRNN.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Grasp force estimation results when different FSs and MPSs are used.

(a) The NRMS of the estimation error; (b) The NMAE of the estimation error; (c) The CC between actual grasp force and estimated grasp force.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Results estimated when different numbers of measurement positions and features are employed.

(a) The NRMS of the estimation error; (b) The NMAE of the estimation error; (c) The CC between estimated force and actual force.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Variations of the estimated results with the variation of measurement position number.

(a) The variations of NRMS; (b) The variations of NMAE; (c) The variations of CC.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Variations of the estimated results with the variation of feature number.

(a) The variations of NRMS; (b) The variations of NMAE; (c) The variations of CC.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Estimated results of the grasp force when GRNNs with different input dimensions are used.

(a) The NRMS of the estimation error; (b) The NMAE of the estimation error; (c) The CC between actual grasp force and estimated grasp force.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Estimated results of PS41 when different FSs are used.

(a) The NRMS of the estimation error; (b) The NMAE of the estimation error; (c) The CC between actual grasp force and estimated grasp force.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 3.

Tukey HSD testing results for NRMS (%) of the MPS of PS41.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Optimal FSs for different MPSs.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 16.

Estimated results of VIWZ when different MPSs are used.

(a) The NRMS of the estimation error; (b) The NMAE of the estimation error; (c) The CC between actual grasp force and estimated grasp force.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 5.

Optimal MPSs for different FSs.

More »

Table 5 Expand