Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Host associations and DNA barcode divergence among Finnish louse flies.

(A) Examples of different louse flies in Finnish fauna. Top row: bird louse flies Ornithomya avicularia, O. chloropus and common swift louse fly Crataerina pallida (note the vestigial wings). Lower row: deer ked Lipoptena cervi, batflies Nycteribia kolenatii and Penicillidia monoceros. All images in scale, scale bar 1 mm. (B) Host associations among the three Ornithomya species. Only one Ornithophila metallica was found in this study and Crataerina spp. were collected from their specific hosts, as indicated in the results. (C) Neighbor-Joining tree for the species covered in this study. Note that the tree demonstrates sequence differences between the taxa and does not represent actual phylogeny. The barcode index number (BIN) for each taxon on the right margin.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Specimens included in the DNA barcode analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Parameter estimates and P-values of the model explaining abundances of bird flies in different bird species.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Observed and expected (in brackets) number of host species breeding in forest, open habitats and wetlands in three bird fly species.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Observed and expected (in brackets) number of host species breeding in cavities, on ground and openly on trees in three bird fly species.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Observed and expected (in brackets) number of host species based on migratory strategy in three bird fly species.

More »

Table 5 Expand