Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study flowchart.

Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study, and the surgical outcomes were compared between the double-flap technique (DFT) and jejunal interposition (JI). Changes in nutritional status and endoscopic findings were evaluated for 28 patients. PPPD, pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic of the double-flap technique (DFT) surgical procedure.

(A) An H-shaped seromuscular flap (2.5 × 3.5 cm) was created at the anterior wall of the gastric remnant. (B) After the posterior wall of the esophagus was fixed to the upper edge of the flap, the anastomosis of the posterior wall was sutured. (C) Anastomosis of the anterior wall was sutured continuously with Gambee stitches. (D) The anastomosis was covered with a Y-shape suturing of the flaps, and a valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using DFT was completed.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Schematic of jejunal interposition.

A 10 to 13 cm jejunal limb was raised up through the retrocolic route. An end-to-side esophagojejunostomy was made using a circular stapler and an end-to-side jejunogastrostomy was made in the anterior face of the remnant stomach with Gambee stitches.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline demographics of the patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Surgical outcomes and early postoperative complications.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of changes in the (A) body weight loss, (B) total protein (TP), (C) albumin (Alb), and (D) hemoglobin (Hb) between the double-flap technique (DFT) and jejunal interposition (JI).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Endoscopic findings at 1 year after surgery.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Postoperative digestive symptoms of the patients.

More »

Table 4 Expand