Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Mutagenic activity of Ag-NP/NSP and Ag-NP/SMA on Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535) by Ames test with and without S9.

(a), (c), (e) and (g) were the results of Ames test without S9 (-S9) in TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 strains, respectively; (b), (d), (f) and (h) were the results of Ames test with S9 (+S9) in TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 strains, respectively. Each bar was the mean with standard deviation for three independent experiments. NC meant the negative control by using distilled water only. * denoted P < 0.05 as obtained by Student’s t test, where the statistical significance between the treated groups and negative control were analysed for each concentration. ** denoted P < 0.01 as obtained by Student’s t test, where the highly statistical significance between the tested groups and negative control were analysed for each concentration.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Transmission electron micrographs of the E. coli morphology after incubation with Ag-NP/NSP and Ag-NP/SMA hybrids.

(a) No treatment, (b) Ag-NP/NSP (1/99), (c) Ag-NP/NSP (7/93) and (d) Ag-NP/NSP (15/85). Representative Ag-NP were labelled as red arrows in (e) Ag-NP/NSP (30/70), and (f) Ag-NP/SMA (7/93). Enlarged view of the area in (e) is shown in (h) with statistic size distribution of Ag-NP (g).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cytotoxicity of Ag-NP/NSP at different weight compositions and Ag-NP/SMA using the MTT assay.

HaCaT cells were incubated with 0–40 ppm Ag-NP concentration of nanocomposites for 24h. The percentage of survival cells was relative to the negative control cells (0 ppm) and by the mean ± standard deviation of four independent experiments. *denoted P < 0.05 as obtained by Student’s t test, where the statistical significance between the treated groups and control group (0 ppm) were analysed for each concentration, respectively. ** denoted P < 0.01 as obtained by Student’s t test, where the highly statistical significance between the tested groups and control group (0 ppm) were analysed for each concentration, respectively.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

The IC10 and IC30 of Ag-NP/NSP and Ag-NP/SMA.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Genotoxicity of chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell on chromosome aberration after treating Ag-NP/NSP and Ag-NP/SMA.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

In vivo genotoxicity of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) in mice after treating Ag-NP/NSP and Ag-NP/SMA.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of antimicrobial efficacy, cell viability, and genotoxicity of Ag-NP/NSP and Ag-NP/SMA.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Conceptual illustration of the interactions between the hybrids, Ag-NP/SMA (7/93) or Ag-NP/NSP (ranging from 1/99–30/70) with cells.

More »

Fig 4 Expand