Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

A brief explanation of the key psychometric properties examined in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of the patients involved in the study (N = 1,117) compared to the entire PCOC cohort for the comparable time period (N = 5,294).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics and distribution of PCOC SAS total scores and individual items, including by distress status.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

PCOC SAS patient-rated assessments: Median total score distress-free total scores (%), and distress-free item scores by palliative care phase and functional status (AKPS).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Inter-rater reliability of PCOC SAS: Types and levels of agreement between patient and proxy ratings by phase and PCOC SAS items.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Intra-rater reliability of PCOC SAS: Types and levels of agreement in repeat patient-reported assessments.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparisons between selected diagnostic groups: Kruskal-Wallis test results.

More »

Table 7 Expand