Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of the study.

CPC, Cerebral Performance Category.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the study population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison between the good and poor neurological outcome near-hanging patients without cardiac arrest.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison between the good and poor neurological outcome near-hanging patients with cardiac arrest.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level and poor neurological outcome following near-hanging injury.

(A) Predictive performance of NSE for the total patient population (AUC, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.841–0.958). (B) Predictive performance of NSE for patients with cardiac arrest (AUC, 0.892; 95% CI, 0.757–0.978). AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify variables predicting a poor neurological outcome.

More »

Table 4 Expand