Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

SPECT and PET imaging set-up for Jaszczak and NEMA phantoms.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Jaszczak phantom SPECT data.

Images obtained by summing 5 transaxial slices of phantom section with uniform concentration of Y-90 (on the left) and corresponding profiles through the centre if each image (on the right). A: non-attenuation corrected image (the shape of the profile is the result of attenuation in the phantom); B: image reconstructed with the original attenuation correction map (the shape of the profile indicates overcorrection of attenuation); C: image reconstructed with the adjusted attenuation correction map (visible improvement in the uniformity of the profile).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

SPECT/CT images of the Jaszczak phantom with different isotope concentrations.

A: Y-90 concentration of 0.1 MBq/ml, B: Y-90 simulated concentration of 1 MBq/ml. From left to right CT image, SPECT image and fusion of the two.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

PET/CT images of the Jaszczak phantom with different isotope concentrations.

A: Y-90 concentration of 0.1 MBq/ml, B: Y-90 simulated concentration of 1 MBq/ml. From left to right CT image, PET image and fusion of the two.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Number of visible cold foci in all analysed Jaszczak phantom images.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

CNR values of all cold foci in SPECT (A) and PET (B) imaging. Images numbered as in Table 2. In A the lines depict the border values of visibility of the region based on Rose criterion (3.7; 4; 4.3); in B the lines depict the border values of visibility of the region based on Rose criterion (2.5; 3; 3.5).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

SPECT/CT images of the NEMA phantom without (A) and with Y-90 in the background (B). From left to right CT image, SPECT image and fusion of the two.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

PET/CT images of the NEMA phantom without (A) and with Y-90 in the background (B). From left to right CT image, PET image and fusion of the two.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

CNR values of hot foci in the NEMA phantom calculated from SPECT (A) and PET (B) images. In A the red marker for the image with Y-90 activity in the background represents the smallest sphere (CNR = 3). All but one foci were clearly visible, as confirmed by CNR values exceeding the threshold of 4 set by the Rose criterion. In B all foci were clearly visible, as confirmed by CNR values exceeding the threshold of 5 set by the Rose criterion.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Inter-observer agreement analysis results for Jaszczak phantom studies.

More »

Table 3 Expand