Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Significant (p<0.05/2) and marginally significant differences (p<0.10/2) within identical twin pairs for comparisons considering both stressed and unstressed vowels.

Two-tailed test with Bonferroni correction.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Number of significant differences (p<0.05/2) among non-genetically related speakers for comparisons considering both stressed and unstressed vowels.

Two-tailed test with Bonferroni correction.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Significant (p<0.05/2) and marginally significant differences (p<0.10/2) within identical twins for stressed and unstressed vowels.

Two-tailed test with Bonferroni correction.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Number of significant differences among non-genetically related speakers for stressed and unstressed vowels (p<0.05/2).

Two-tailed test with Bonferroni correction.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Effect size estimates for each vowel segment and each formant frequency.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 1.

Two-dimensional vocalic space comparisons between identical twin pairs (A) and stressed and unstressed vowel data points by speaker (B).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Front vowels (A) and back vowels (B) vocalic spaces’ means and confidence interval for intra-identical twin pairs comparisons.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Intervocalic Euclidean distances and mean F1-F2 values between phonetic vowels.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Effects of lexical stress in the two-dimensional vocalic space intra- and inter-speakers.

More »

Fig 3 Expand