Fig 1.
Types of trials in the multi-gaze cueing task.
Note: The foreground gaze was either directed away from (incongruent, left column) or towards (congruent, right column) the target (white square), and either matched (top row) or mismatched (bottom row) background gaze cues. The cueing effect index was calculated by subtracting congruent from incongruent trial reaction times. Faces shown here are for illustrative purposes only (from the Chicago Face Database [22]) and do not reflect face stimuli from the multi-gaze cueing task. For actual faces used, see Cohen and colleagues’ paper [4].
Table 1.
Stimuli measurements for multi-gaze cueing task.
Table 2.
Data cleaning analysis for European Canadians.
Table 3.
Raw reaction times for European Canadians.
Table 4.
Cueing effect indices for European Canadians.
Fig 2.
Cueing effects for European Canadians.
Note: Cueing Effect Index as a function of SOA and Prime for (A) matched and (B) mismatched conditions. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Participants are European Canadians.
Table 5.
Data cleaning analysis for East Asian Canadians.
Fig 3.
Cueing effects for East Asian Canadians.
Note: Cueing Effect Index as a function of SOA and prime for (A) matched and (B) mismatched conditions. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Participants are East Asian Canadians.
Table 6.
Raw reaction times for East Asian Canadians.
Table 7.
Cueing effect indices for East Asian Canadians.