Fig 1.
Responses (A) by state and (B) by country. Full List of Respondents—Australia (<1%), Brazil (<1%), Cayman Islands (<1%), Canada (1%), Denmark (<1%), Germany(<1%), Greece(<1%), Hong Kong(<1%), Ireland (<1%), Mexico (<1%), Netherlands (<1%), Russia (<1%), United Arab Emirates (<1%), United Kingdom (1%), United States (96%). List of missing states: Alaska, Mississippi, Montana, West Virginia.
Fig 2.
Descriptive outcomes for respondents by sex, years of running experience, and age.
Percentage of male and female respondents, extent of running experience, and age distribution of respondents depicted across the figure graphics. Greater number of respondents per category is depicted in darker shades of blue for experience and age histograms.
Fig 3.
(A) Difference in number of running motives and (B) running times of day during the pandemic. (C) Motives for running and (D) running times per day before and during the pandemic by percentage responses. (E) Running locations before and during the pandemic by percentage responses. Differences in numbers of (A) running motives and (B) running times of day represented in the histograms, with increases in outcomes depicted in blue, and decreases depicted in red, and increased number of occurrences represented with darker color shades. Percentage responses for (C) running motives, (D) running times per day, and (E) running locations before and during the pandemic are depicted within the stacked bar plots.
Table 1.
Mean outcomes and student’s t-test comparisons on running behaviors before and during the pandemic.
Table 2.
Logistic regression outcomes assessing the influence of demographic factors on running behavior changes during the pandemic.
Table 3.
Injuries reported before and during the pandemic by injury type and body part.
Table 4.
Short response examples by response themes.