Table 1.
Standardized regression coefficients regressing each DV on political orientation, condition, and the interaction term.
Fig 1.
Association between political orientation and certainty that climate change is happening by past (blue) and future (red) temporal framing condition.
Solid vertical line represents the Johnson-Neyman value. To the right of this, the differences in certainty ratings by condition are significant.
Fig 2.
Effect of political ideology on climate change certainty is mediated by certainty that environmental changes have/will happen, dependent on temporal framing condition.
Table 2.
Standardized regression coefficients regressing each explanatory variable on political orientation, condition, and the interaction term.
Table 3.
Associations between political orientation and the dimensions of time perspective.
Table 4.
Standardized regression coefficients regressing each DV on SDO-E, condition, and the interaction term.
Fig 3.
Association between anti-egalitarianism and certainty that climate change is happening by temporal framing condition (past = blue, future = red).
Solid vertical line represents the Johnson-Neyman value. To the right of this, the differences in certainty ratings by condition are significant.
Fig 4.
Association between political orientation and certainty that climate change is happening by temporal framing condition (past = blue, future = red).
Solid vertical line represents the Johnson-Neyman value. To the left of this, the differences in certainty ratings by condition are significant.
Table 5.
Standardized regression coefficients regressing each DV on political orientation, condition, and the interaction term all participants, independent of rating condition.
Fig 5.
Association between SDO-D and certainty that climate change is happening by temporal framing condition (past = blue, future = red).
Solid vertical lines represents the Johnson-Neyman value. Outside of these bounds, the differences in certainty ratings by condition are significant.