Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Configuration of the reference antenna design (a) 1st design, (b) 2nd design, (c) 3rd design, (d) 4th design (reference antenna), and (e) Back view for all designs.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

S11 of the evolution designs.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Optimal values of the reference antenna dimensions (mm).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

(a) Mushroom-like EBG unit cell, and (b) Bandgap characteristics of (a).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Vialess square patch EBG unit cell, and (b) Bandgap characteristics of (a).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

(a) Vialess proposed EBG unit, and (b) Band-gap characteristics of the proposed vialess EBG unit cell.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Optimal values of the proposed EBG dimensions (mm).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

(a) Front view of the reference antenna with EBG, (b) Back view of the reference antenna with EBG, (c) Front view of the modified antenna with EBG, (d) Back view of the modified antenna with EBG, (e) Front view of Modified antenna, and (f) Back view of Modified antenna.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

S11 of the reference antenna alone, the integrated reference antenna with EBG, the modified antenna with EBG, and the modified antenna alone.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Optimal values of the modified antenna dimensions (mm).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

Surface current (a) Modified antenna alone, (b) Reference antenna, and (c) Modified antenna with EBG.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

S11 result of the reference antenna alone, and integrated modified antenna with EBG.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Normalized radiation performance of the reference antenna alone, and integrated modified antenna with EBG vialess (a) x-z plane, and (b) y-z plane.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

S11 performance based on bending along (a) x-z plane, and (b) y-z plane.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Radiation pattern performance based on bending at diameter d = 140 along x-z and y-z planes.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Developed human models (a) Arm, and (b) Chest.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 4.

Properties of the model tissue [5, 11].

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 14.

(a) Proposed design on chest, (b) Proposed design on arm, (c) Reference antenna on chest, and (d) Reference antenna on arm.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

S11 performance of designs placing on the chest and the arm (a) Reference antenna and (b) Proposed design.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

S11 performance with varying the dielectric constant of the skin layer (a) Reference antenna and (b) Proposed design.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Radiation pattern performance placing on chest and arm (a) Reference antenna, and (b) Proposed design.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 5.

SAR (W/kg) values of proposed design.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 18.

SAR values of proposed design when touch the skin over 1 g (a) On chest, (b) On arm y-axis, and (c) On arm x-axis.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 6.

SAR (W/kg) values of varying the dielectric constant of skin layer.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of previous work with proposed design based on flexible materials at 2.4 GHz.

More »

Table 7 Expand