Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Evolution of COVID-19 infections in Minnesota (see S1 Video for more detail).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Total county-to-county trips per day.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Reported infections by county.

(a) March 22, 2020. (b) June 22, 2020.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of predicted and reported infected individuals.

Black vertical lines show the intervals in ∏ρ. (a) Total reported and predicted infections. (b) Hennepin County (Minneapolis). (c) Ramsey County (St. Paul).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Effects of travel on COVID-19 infections.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Percent change in infections for different travel scenarios.

The “observed” scenario is the base travel scenario. (a) [Observed]—[No travel]. (b) [Pre-pandemic travel]—[Observed].

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Calibrated reproductive number and detection probability.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Calibrated parameters by county (see S1 Video for more detail).

(a) Reproductive number, r, on May 1, 2020. (b) Average detection probability, λ.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Effect of 2-week λ intervals on calibrated parameters.

(a) Effects on reproductive number. (b) Effects on detection probability.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Sensitivity of calibrated parameters to variations in σ and .

(a) Sensitivity of ri(t) to σ. (b) Sensitivity of λi(t) to σ. (c) Sensitivity of ri(t)(t) to . (d) Sensitivity of λi(t) to .

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 1.

Sensitivity of ξ with respect to σ and .

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 11.

Projected cases.

(a) Predicted infections using rate of spread of June 21. (b) Predicted infections using rate of spread of April 1.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Predictions of removed (either recovered or deceased) individuals.

(a) Comparison of predicted and reported removed individuals. (b) Percent of removed population.

More »

Fig 12 Expand