Fig 1.
Notes: * participants could have met multiple injury-related exclusion criteria.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the participants included compared with people who did not have a description of their injury event, and could not be included, n(%), N = 5,813.
Table 2.
Characteristics of motor vehicle drivers stratified by fault attribution, n(%), N = 1,150.
Table 3.
Characteristics of motorcyclists stratified by fault attribution, n(%), N = 786.
Table 4.
Characteristics of pedal cyclists stratified by fault attribution, n(%), N = 196.
Table 5.
Characteristics of pedestrians stratified by fault attribution, n(%), N = 354.
Fig 2.
Proportion of cases with no recollection of the injury event stratified by fault attributions by road user group, based on the terms used in the text description.
Table 6.
Summary of the text used to describe the injury events.
Fig 3.
The total number of injury events across different times of the day over the days of week for each road user group.
Fig 4.
Proportion of cases with each type of collision belonging to each fault group, drivers.
Fig 5.
Proportion of cases with type of collision belonging to each fault group, motorcyclists.
Fig 6.
Proportion of cases with each type of collision belonging to each fault group, pedal cyclists.
Fig 7.
Proportion of cases with each type of collision belonging to each fault group, pedestrians.