Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart of the randomized feasibility and pilot trial.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Participant characteristics presented in counts for categorical variables and in medians (IQRs) for continuous variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Participant brain lesion locations and presentation of spatial neglect at baseline, based on different test criteria.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Results, from T1 to T4, each two weeks apart, of a) CBS via KF-NAP, b) lateralized omission discrepancy in the Bells Test, c) deviation (mm) in line bisection, and d) accuracy score of the Scene Copying test. The gray bar between T1 and T2 indicates the treatment period. Each data point denotes the median with the error bar representing the IQR.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Occurrence rates of spatial neglect at each time point based on the criterion of a given outcome measure.

The gray bar between T1 and T2 indicates the treatment period. CBS: Catherine Bergego Scale; B_l: Bells Test–lateralized omission discrepancy; B_s: Bells Test: starting column; LB: Line Bisection; S_e: Scene Copying–egocentric asymmetry; S_a: Scene Copying–allocentric asymmetry.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Chi-squared results on the occurrence rates of spatial neglect in the treatment vs. control groups, based on the criteria set in different measures.

More »

Table 3 Expand