Fig 1.
Schematic of two recovery options in a toy network.
Fig 2.
Recovery trajectory of toy complete and hub-and-spoke topologies.
This figure portrays the trajectory of the recovery process for two toy networks with different topologies: (A) Complete topology and (B) Hub-and-Spoke topology.
Fig 3.
Network topology and extrapolation with 16 nodes used in the current research.
Table 1.
Number of links and nodes for different network topologies.
Table 2.
Definition of network topology measures used in the current research.
Fig 4.
Recovery trajectory of 16 network topologies.
(A) 8 nodes, (B) 14 nodes, (C) 20 nodes, and (D) 26 nodes.
Fig 5.
Recoverability measure over multiple size and topology.
Fig 6.
The analytical function of recoverability measure trends over size.
(A) Diverging Tail, Hub-and-Spoke, Tree, Crossing Path, Double-U, Central Ring, Ring, Converging Tail, and Single Depot with 3 and 5 routes; Diamond, Matching Pair, Complete, and Random networks with connection probability of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7. (B) Scale-Free, Grid, and Complete Grid networks.
Table 3.
Results of the linear regression models with simple or quadratic form.
Fig 7.
Marginal effects of topology measures on recoverability measure.