Table 1.
Missing data from Gail model questions in 2,339 U.S. women who have undergone commercial breast cancer risk testing.
Fig 1.
Distribution of patient samples when risk scores calculated with Gail model plus PRS compared to the Streamlined models plus PRS.
Log-transformed values of the five-year risk distributions and the t-test results for the risk estimates obtained by the Gail model plus PRS versus the Streamlined model plus PRS. The t-test indicates that there is no difference in mean values between the Streamlined model plus PRS and Gail model plus PRS (p = 0.8441).
Table 2.
AUC and OPERA values, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), for different risk prediction models in different race/ethnicity.