Fig 1.
The general model used in this paper.
Table 1.
The original data table of maternal health care in China from 2004 to 2018.
Table 2.
Weight value of each evaluation indicator.
Fig 2.
The ranks of alternatives (years) according to different applied methods.
A: Weighted TOPSIS; B: Weighted RSR; C: Fuzzy comprehensive; D: Combination Chart of three methods.
Table 3.
Weighted TOPSIS method evaluation of maternal health care in China from 2004 to 2018.
Table 4.
Weighted RSR method evaluation of maternal health care in China from 2004 to 2018.
Table 5.
The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of maternal health care in China from 2004 to 2018.
Fig 3.
Spearman rank correlation analysis of the results obtained by different methods.
A: Correlation between Ci and WRSR; B: Correlation between Ci and 0.5WRSR +0.5Ci; C: Correlation between WRSR and 0.5WRSR +0.5Ci.
Fig 4.
The Ci under different unitary variation ratios for Wk.
A: W1; B: W2; C: W3; D: W4; E: W5; F: W6.
Table 6.
Weights under different unitary variation ratios for W1.