Table 1.
A description of the alternatives selected for multi-criteria analysis.
Fig 1.
Geographic localization of selected alternatives.
Source: Authors’ projection using the maps reprinted from ADR under a CC BY license, with permission from ADR Centru, original copyright 2016.
Table 2.
Stakeholders’ participants at focus groups.
Fig 2.
A three-level criteria tree with five criteria each with sub-criteria developed to select the most suitable investments’ area in South Transylvania based on cultural heritage and trademark potential.
(Source: Authors’ own projection).
Table 3.
Table of relative scores.
Table 4.
Criteria and sub-criteria ranking by priorities.
Table 5.
AHP results.
Fig 3.
Geographic localization of A14.
Source: Authors’ projection using the maps reprinted from ADR under a CC BY license, with permission from ADR Centru, original copyright 2016.
Fig 4.
Geographic localization of A11.
Source: Authors’ projection using the maps reprinted from ADR under a CC BY license, with permission from ADR Centru, original copyright 2016.
Fig 5.
Geographic localization of A8.
Source: Authors’ projection using the maps reprinted from ADR under a CC BY license, with permission from ADR Centru, original copyright 2016.
Fig 6.
Geographic localization of A10.
Source: Authors’ projection using the maps reprinted from ADR under a CC BY license, with permission from ADR Centru, original copyright 2016.
Table 6.
Alternatives ranking.