Fig 1.
Summaries of each of the validated PMk along with their respective graphical representations to the right.
An amplification factor of 2 was used to provide clarity to more subtle movements in visualizations.
Fig 2.
Illustrations of both the percentage of variance explained (left) and Eigenvalues (right) for each PMk.
Table 1.
Mean and standard deviation for independent and dependent variables in both conditions and for each walking-speed.
Table 2.
Output from a comparison of identified Eq 4 models using Anova.
The PA4RMS model was found to be the best fit however insignificantly.
Table 3.
Output from a comparison of identified Eq 5 models using Anova.
The PA6RMS model was found to be the best fit.