Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Classification of defects that includes a modification of the modified DDE index, which includes the addition of code 9.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Details of the gene and SNP investigated in this study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Measuring the total area of the buccal surface (SA) and the area of the enamel defect found in the incisal third (DA) of a UCLP individual, using the negative photo as a tool to help to limit the extension.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Measuring the total area of the buccal surface (SA) and the area of the enamel defect found in all three thirds (DA) of a BCLP individual.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Measuring the total area of the buccal surface (SA) and the areas of the enamel defects found (DA) of a UCLP and BCLP individuals, respectively, using the negative photo as a tool to help to limit the extension.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Means and medians of the percentage of the surface area affected by the defect of the teeth inside and outside the cleft area, for all types of clefts analyzed.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Frequency of individuals presenting teeth with and without the presence of developmental defects of enamel, inside and outside the cleft area.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Frequency of teeth affected by the type of cleft concerning the location of the enamel defect on the buccal surface, inside and outside the cleft area (n = number of individuals evaluated).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Frequency of teeth affected by the type of cleft concerning the DDE code, outside the cleft area (n = number of individuals evaluated).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Frequency of C and T alleles found in individuals allocated to G1 and G2.

More »

Table 7 Expand