Table 1.
Comparison of surveillance and monitoring systems for AR in humans and animals in Germany.
Table 2.
Escherichia coli data for different populations collected from Zoonosis-Monitoring, GERM-Vet and ARS from 2014 to 2017.
Fig 1.
Data extraction from three surveillance and monitoring systems for AR.
A) ARS system; B) Zoonosis-Monitoring and C) GERM-Vet.
Table 3.
Individual resistance proportions (%) from different populations against four selected antibiotics; ampicillin (AMP), cefotaxime (CTX), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and gentamicin (GEN).
Fig 2.
Heatmap describes different relative frequencies of resistance combinations for each population.
From grey to red it shows the lowest to highest relative frequencies of resistance combinations. The x-axis explains the resistant combinations; from all susceptible (left) to all resistant (right). Antibiotics are described with ‘0’ as ‘susceptible’ and ‘1’ ‘resistant’. The order is GEN (gentamicin), CIP (ciprofloxacin), CTX (cefotaxime) and AMP (ampicillin). The y-axis denotes each population together with their clusters.
Fig 3.
Cluster dendogram of different animal and human populations based on the relative frequency of resistance combinations to ampicillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin.
The x-axis describes the averaged similarities between the populations and between clusters. The y-axis shows each population and different clusters.