Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Study population characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Wound grading distribution among the DFU study population.

Patient DFU were classified according to the University of Texas Wound Grading Classification System which grades them depending on the presence or absence of infection and ischemia, as detailed in Material and Methods section.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Texas wound grading distribution among the study population.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Distribution of microorganisms isolated from various samples used in the study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Microorganism isolates distribution among the study population with clinically infected wounds.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Main species distribution among the study population with clinically infected wounds.

The species distribution was calculated as percentage of the total number of isolates within the same wound grade.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Antibiogram sensitivity pattern for most prevalent isolates.

More »

Table 5 Expand