Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Navarro’s eye model parameters used for the IOLs design and simulation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Corneal asphericity used to simulate corneas after myopic and hyperopic laser ablation surgery [20] and fourth-order SA () calculated for a 6.00 mm entrance pupil diameter.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Parameters of the IOLs used in the study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

The on -axis MTF of the designed IOLs as a function of misalignment (left column) and tilt (right column) with a 3.00 mm pupil diameter and 100 cycles per degree with different corneas.

The tangential MTF (continuous line) and the sagittal MTF (dashed line) are shown for each cornea: A) Navarro’s eye model cornea, B) Myopic cornea, C) Hyperopic cornea.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Minimum values of misalignment and tilt for which the average of tangential and sagittal MTF is below 0.43 (for an object of 100 cycles/mm and a 3.00 mm pupil diameter) at every analysed cornea.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

RMS defocus () values of the designed IOLs for misalignment (left column) and tilt (right column) with each different cornea: A) Normal, B) Myopic, C) Hyperopic.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

RMS astigmatism ( and ) values of the designed IOLs for misalignment (left column) and tilt (right column) with each different cornea: A) Normal, B) Myopic, C) Hyperopic.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

RMS coma ( and ) values of the designed IOLs for misalignment (left column) and tilt (right column) with each different cornea: A) Normal, B) Myopic, C) Hyperopic.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

RMS spherical aberration () values of the designed IOLs for misalignment (left column) and tilt (right column) with each different cornea: A) Normal, B) Myopic, C) Hyperopic.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

MTF average values (average between tangential and sagittal) for each IOL design (Lens A, Lens B and Lens C) with each cornea, in the worst-case scenario: 5 degrees of tilt and 1 mm misalignment. Corneas are represented in rows: A) Normal, B) Myopic, C) Hyperopic.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Simulation of the retinal images of a 5’ angular size optotype (VA of 0.00 LogMar scale) generated by each designed IOL (in columns: Lens A, Lens B and Lens C) with every cornea (in rows: A) Normal, B) Myopic, C) Hyperopic) at the worst-case scenario (a combination of 5 degrees of tilt and 1 mm misalignment of the IOL).

More »

Fig 7 Expand