Fig 1.
How heterosexual couples met in Switzerland, by year of meeting (1995–2018): all contexts (Panel A), specific online contexts (Panel B).
Source: EFG 2018. Weighted data by wecritpers. Lowess regression smoothing with bandwidth = .6 is applied, except for online meeting contexts, where a bandwidth = .3 is applied. Percentages before applying lowess smoothing are reported in S2 Table in S1 File.
Table 1.
Logistic regression coefficients predicting family formation intentions by meeting context.
Fig 2.
Predicted probabilities of family formation intentions, by meeting context and gender, 95% CI.
Based on logistic regression models including interactions between meeting context and gender, controlling for whether same-sex couple, type of union, age, tertiary education, whether employed, whether previously married, prior cohabitation, biological children, (common children), religiosity, migration background, work-life conflict, relationship satisfaction, poor health, and partnership duration. Stars indicate probabilities significantly different compared to the offline category: † p < 0.10; * p < .05; ** p < 0.01.
Table 2.
OLS regression coefficients predicting relationship and life satisfaction by meeting context.
Table 3.
Logistic and multinomial logistic regression coefficients predicting exogamy by meeting context.