Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Relationship between FBG and post-load BGLs.

Shown are the post-challenge BGL values (mean; standard deviation) on an oral glucose tolerance test in 26,242 patients between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2015 from the three major laboratories in Queensland, Australia for FBGs between 3.0 and 6.0mmol/l. Less than 0.1% of patients had FBG below or above these values.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

ROC analysis of FBG and elevated post-load BGLs.

Shown is the ROC analysis (MedCalc statistical software) for the diagnosis of GDM based on elevated 1-hr and/or 2-hr BGLs on 75 gm OGTT for FBGs from 3.0 to 6.0 mmol/l. At FBG above 4.6 mmol/l, the sensitivity was 54.3% and specificity of 77.1%.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Analysis of screening FBG levels on rates of elevated post-challenge BGLs.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes in subgroup of women in HAPO (adapted from data of McIntyre et al; Ref 4).

More »

Table 2 Expand