Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of the models included in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and pathology characteristics compared between Crohn’s disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Validation of the models integrating clinical and endoscopy in 530 patients who had clinical and endoscopic data.

Data shown as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and a p-value <0.05 indicates statistical significance.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of validation of the model integrating clinical and endoscopic findings for each model compared among cohorts.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

(A) Validation of the 4 ITBvsCD models in 199 patients who had clinical, endoscopic, and pathology data. Data shown as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and a p-value <0.05 indicates statistical significance. (B) Distribution of the calculated probability of intestinal tuberculosis for each of the 4 ITBvsCD models. The bottom and top of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, giving the interquartile range. The line through the box indicates the median, and the error bars indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Validation of the models integrating clinical, endoscopic, and pathology data in 199 patients who had clinical, endoscopic, and pathology data.

Data shown as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and a p-value <0.05 indicates statistical significance.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance of all models in diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis in 199 patients with available clinical, endoscopic, and pathology findings.

More »

Table 4 Expand