Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of relevant solution methods and objective functions for CMCVRP-RS.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Illustration of the CMLDN-RS problem.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison before and after the CMCLDN-RS optimization.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Symbols and description.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

AGPSO flowchart.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

AGPSO algorithm procedure.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Illustration of the archive truncation operation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Procedure of the mutation operator.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Description of instances.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of the results of algorithm optimization.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Characteristics of logistics facilities.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Initial assignment of customers served by each DC.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Assignment of customers served via internal vehicle sharing within each DC in the grand alliance.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Routes of customers served among DCs.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 4.

Result comparison before and after CMCLDN-RS optimization in three periods.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 12.

Result comparison before and after CMCLDN-RS optimization in three periods.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of initial and optimized costs and number of vehicles.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 13.

Comparison between initial and optimized networks within one working period.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

Profit distribution of DCs for global sharing.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

Feasible alliance based on global sharing in CMCLDN-RS.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Optimal collaboration sequences based on the SMP principle.

More »

Table 16 Expand

Fig 6.

Profit allocation by using MCRS, Shapley, nucleolus, and CGA.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 17.

Comparison of cases A, B, and C.

More »

Table 17 Expand

Fig 7.

Illustration of cost and number of vehicles in cases A, B, and C.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 18.

Profits for each DC in cases A, B, and C.

More »

Table 18 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison of profits for each DC in cases A, B, and C.

More »

Fig 8 Expand