Fig 1.
Flowchart has been drawn with diagrams.net and by adopting its symbols and conventions.
Fig 2.
Flowchart has been drawn with diagrams.net and by adopting its symbols and conventions.
Table 1.
Population, sample and sub-sample sizes for scientific areas in EXP1.
Table 2.
Population, sample, sub-sample sizes and number of missing articles for scientific areas in EXP2.
Table 3.
Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP1 (95% confidence level intervals in parenthesis), bibliometric vs peer review ratings.
Table 4.
Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP2 (95% confidence level intervals in parenthesis), bibliometric vs peer review ratings.
Fig 3.
”Error-bar” plots of the Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP1, bibliometric vs peer review ratings.
The confidence intervals are at 95% confidence level and estimates corresponding to ,
and
are in red, green and blue, respectively.
Fig 4.
”Error-bar” plots of the Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP2, bibliometric vs peer review ratings.
The confidence intervals are at 95% confidence level and estimates corresponding to ,
and
are in red, green and blue, respectively.
Fig 5.
”Error-bar” plots of the Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP1, P1 vs P2 ratings.
The confidence intervals are at 95% confidence level and estimates corresponding to ,
(DBR) and
(IR) are in red, green and blue, respectively.
Fig 6.
”Error-bar” plots of the Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP2, P1 vs P2 ratings.
The confidence intervals are at 95% confidence level and estimates corresponding to ,
(DBR) and
(IR) are in red, green and blue, respectively.
Table 5.
Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP1 (95% confidence level intervals in parenthesis), P1 vs P2 ratings.
Table 6.
Cohen’s kappa coefficient estimates (percent) for EXP2 (95% confidence level intervals in parenthesis), P1 vs P2 rating.