Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CTPA illustration of RV/LV diameter ratio measurement: Measurement in this patient was 1.28.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of the study selection process.

Risk stratification according to RV/LV diameter ratio.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of acute pulmonary embolism patients in different RV/LV diameter ratio groups.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

ICU admission and expired patients in each RV/LV diameter ratio groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance of RV/LV diameter >1, elevated NT-pro-BNP, RVD detection by Echo, and elevated troponin for predicting ICU admission.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Composition of elevated and not elevated NT-pro-BNP patients in each RV/LV diameter ratio groups.

(P = 0.000).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Composition of RVD detected by Echo and RVD not detected by Echo patients in each RV/LV diameter ratio groups.

(P< 0.001).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Composition of RVD detected by Echo and RVD not detected by Echo patients in each RV/LV diameter ratio groups.

(P = 0.001).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

sPESI score distribution in each RV/LV diameter ratio groups.

More »

Fig 6 Expand