Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Deep FR system with face detector and alignment.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Different network architectures of FR.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

AlexNet architecture.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Core knowledge of transfer learning.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The general overall view of the proposed face recognition system.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Block diagram of the proposed biometric system (images from dataset published in [18]).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Face images before and after preprocessing (images from dataset published in [18]).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The schema of the modified AlexNet, where (#S) is the number of subjects in the dataset used during training.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Different types of activation functions for classification.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

General block diagram of the fog computing FR system.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

General architecture of the fog computing FR system.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Fog computing network for the face recognition scheme.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Face images of SDUMLA-HMT subjects under different conditions as a dataset example [18].

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 2.

Parameter settings used in the experiments.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 13.

Recognition time of the proposed FR system and individual classifiers.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Precision of our proposed system and the three comparison systems.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Recall of the proposed system and the three comparison systems.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Accuracy of our proposed system and the three comparison systems.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

The specificity of the proposed system and the three comparison systems.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 3.

Average results of our proposed system and the three comparison systems.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 18.

Average results of our proposed system and the three comparison systems.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 4.

Comparative accuracy details of KNN, SVM and DCNN using the SDUMLA dataset.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 19.

Comparative evaluation of the proposed FR system vs recent literature.

More »

Fig 19 Expand