Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The Number Symbol Coding Task.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Histogram of Number Symbol Coding Task.

This histogram demonstrates that the Number Symbol Coding Task follows a normal distribution with a mean of 30.1, standard deviation of 13.8, and a median of 30.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Construct validity with clinical measures.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Construct validity with neuropsychological measures and patient-reported outcomes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance of Number-Symbol Coding Task by demographics, staging, and diagnoses.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Discrimination of the Number Symbol Coding Task.

ROC curves comparing the discriminability of the NSCT, patient and caregiver forms of the QDRS to differentiate healthy controls (CDR 0) from individuals with any form of cognitive impairment (CDR>0). The combination of the NSCT, a patient-reported outcome (patient QDRS), and informant-reported outcome (caregiver QDRS) correctly classified 90.8% of cases (see details in text). Key: AUC = Area under the curve; QDRS = Quick Dementia Rating System; NSCT = Number Symbol Coding Task.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Number Symbol Coding Task and volumetric MRI measures.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Clinical profiles of Number Symbol Coding Task scores.

More »

Table 5 Expand