Fig 1.
The face-target pairs used in Experiment 1 are surrounded by the dotted line, and those in Experiment 2 are surrounded by the solid line. The vertical part indicates the type of face, and the horizontal part indicates the type of target. In Experiment 1, there were 6 faces (valid-cue, invalid-cue, no-cue) and targets (positive, negative). In Experiment 2, there were 8 faces (valid-cue, invalid-cue) and targets (positive, negative, neutral, random). The faces and the targets in Fig 1 are not the original images that were used in our study, but schematic images used for illustrative purposes.
Fig 2.
Each trial of the gaze cueing task.
The faces and the targets in Fig 2 are not the original images that were used in our study, but schematic images used for illustrative purposes. (A) From one to five blocks of the gaze-cueing task only consist of the gaze-cue phase. (B) A final block consists of gaze-cue and evaluation phases.
Fig 3.
Means of median response times for each type of gaze and emotional valence in Experiment 1.
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Fig 4.
Facial trustworthiness for each type of gaze and emotional valence in Experiment 1.
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Means of trustworthiness scores for each condition are shown above each bar.
Table 1.
Results of Bayesian paired samples t-tests in Experiment 1.
Fig 5.
Median response times for each type of gaze and target in Experiment 2.
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Fig 6.
Trustworthiness for each type of gazes and targets in Experiment 2.
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Means of trustworthiness scores for each condition are shown above each bar.
Table 2.
Results of Bayesian paired sample t-test for valid faces.