Table 1.
Characteristics of the intraocular lenses used in the study.
Table 2.
Pre-operative data: Demographics, AXL = axial length, UCDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity, BCDVA = best corrected distance visual acuity, logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, IOL = intraocular lens, D = dioptre.
Fig 1.
The mesopic non-glare (A) and mesopic with glare (B) contrast sensitivity values of two intraocular lenses in different spatial frequencies. There were no statistically significant differences in any spatial frequencies.
Table 3.
Post-operative visual outcomes.
m = manifest, D = dioptre, SE = spherical equivalent, UCDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity, BCDVA = best corrected distance visual acuity, logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.
Fig 2.
(A) Glistening evaluation with the subjective slit-lamp examination method in eyes implanted with the Z-Flex 860FAB or the AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL. (B) Objective assessment of glistening by Scheimpflug analysis followed by computer-based image analysis in eyes implanted with Z-Flex 860FAB or the AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL. (C) Correlation analysis revealed a strong correspondence between the results of the two glistening evaluation techniques.
Fig 3.
(A) The quality of the tear film examined by the HD Analyzer and expressed as TF-OSI values of the different IOLs. (B) Correlation between the TF-OSI and BCDVA.