Table 1.
Accuracy of the existing and proposed models (16–38 weeks).
Table 2.
Accuracy of the existing and proposed models (33–40 weeks).
Fig 1.
MEDAPEs of the proposed and existing models (16–38 weeks).
Fig 2.
MEDAPEs of the proposed and existing models (33–40 weeks).
Fig 3.
Intergrowth 21st Project fetal growth chart applied to an Indonesian population.
Fig 4.
WHO fetal growth chart applied to an Indonesian population.
Fig 5.
Scatter plot for the proposed quadratic model.
Fig 6.
MEDAPEs of the proposed and existing EFW-GA models (13–36 weeks).
Fig 7.
MEDAPEs of the proposed and existing EFW-GA models (32–42 weeks).
Table 3.
Accuracy of the proposed and existing EFW-GA models (13–36 weeks).
Table 4.
Accuracy of the proposed and existing EFW-GA models (32–42 weeks).
Table 5.
Estimated fetal weights for an Indonesian population.
Fig 8.
Proposed fetal weight chart with test data superimposed.
Key: = 10th percentile,
= 50th percentile,
= 90th percentile,
= 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 9.
Fit of proposed weight chart compared with existing references.
Key: as for Fig 8 with profile limits added from -------- = global reference [24] — — = Intergrowth 21st Project reference (International standard) [19] – – – – = WHO [5].
Table 6.
Fetal birth weight at term pregnancy (37–41 weeks).
Fig 10.
Proposed fetal weight chart (20–40 weeks) used with data relating to 16 LBW babies.
Table 7.
Signals of fetal growth abnormality.