Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics and comparison of the group of patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 216) and control group (N = 99).
Table 2.
Associations between participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics with PHQ-9 scores.
Table 3.
Associations between participants’ characteristics and MDD as well as MDD and/or dysthymia categories.
Fig 1.
ROC curve of the PHQ-9 for detecting a likely: a) ‘major depressive disorder’ in adults with Type 2 diabetes (N = 216); b) ‘major depressive disorder’ in the non-diabetic group (N = 99); c) ‘MDD and/or dysthymia’ in the diabetic group (N = 216); d) ‘MDD and/or dysthymia’ in the non-diabetic group (N = 99).
Table 4.
Accuracy of the PHQ-9 cut-off values for detecting major depression (diagnosed with the MINI) in adults with type 2 diabetes for the Polish sample (N = 216).
Table 5.
Accuracy of the PHQ-9 cut-off values for detecting major depression (diagnosed with the MINI) in adults without diabetes for the Polish sample (N = 99).
Table 6.
Accuracy of the PHQ-9 cut-off values for detecting any depression disorder (diagnosed with the MINI) in adults with diabetes for the Polish sample (N = 216).
Table 7.
Accuracy of the PHQ-9 cut-off values for detecting any depression disorder (diagnosed with the MINI) in adults without diabetes for the Polish sample (N = 99).