Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

CT protocol parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

a. All CT protocols (SDCT and RDCT-1, 2 and 3) reconstructed with FBP and IRL4 and IRL6 in sagittal reformations. b. As for Fig 1a, but images were obtained from a male cadaver (age at death: 53 years; BMI: 20.8 kg/m2).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Objective image noise.

A Measurement of CT number and objective image noise (OIN). Axial CT image shows placement of ROI (circle) in the center of the body of the third lumbar vertebra. Measurements were performed in three adjacent slices and the mean values were calculated. B Quantitative analyses of OIN (defined as SD of CT number) for SDCT and three different RDCT protocols, as measured in the center of the body of the third lumbar vertebra. Images were reconstructed with FBP and IRL4 and IRL6. Horizontal midpoints of diamonds represent mean values, and error bars denote 95% CIs. Compared to SDCT with FBP, even the RDCT protocol with lowest dose (RDCT-3) reconstructed with IR resulted in lower OIN.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Radiation dose.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mean image quality ratings of all analyzed anatomical structures for SDCT and RDCT protocols.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Number of diagnostically acceptable studies of the lumbar spine.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Direct comparison in quality of axial, coronal and sagittal reformatted images produced by the SDCT reconstructed with FBP, and RDCT-2 reconstructed with IRL6.

More »

Fig 4 Expand