Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

SF-36 Questionnaire Structure.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Visualization of algorithm adjusting data.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

General characteristics of socio-demographic data.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of quality of life (M±SD; 95% CI; σ2).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results of the STAI questionnaire for specific groups of participants.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of the STAI standardized scores (1–10).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Visualization of cluster analysis results.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Distribution of amount of participants from different groups in each cluster.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Distribution of amount of participants by physical health indices in each cluster.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Distribution of amount of participants by mental health indices in each cluster.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 5.

Presentation of full results put in cluster categories.

Number in brackets indicate the number of participants in a specific group.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Cluster characteristics with average values (M±SD) of obtained results.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Confusion matrices.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Proportion of feature importance among quality of life (results of SF-36).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Proportion of feature importance among socio-demographic indices.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Feature importance for T-anxiety prediction among quality of life indices.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Feature importance for S-anxiety prediction among quality of life indices.

More »

Fig 11 Expand