Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Existing EMB schemes.

(a) Scheme A. (b) Scheme B.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

EMB of electric bus.

(a) Structure and working principle: (1) motor stator, (2) motor rotor, (3) head, (4) screw, (5) force sensor, (6) push rod, (7) linear sensor, (8) arm, (9) piston, (10) brake shoes, (11) brake disc, (12) caliper. (b) 3D model.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Back EMF waveform of BLDC.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Force analyses of the threaded mechanism.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Characteristic of the caliper.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

EMB system model.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Key parameters of the EMB system model.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Relationship among vehicle driving conditions, driver’s intentions and pedal behaviors.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Hidden Markov model structure.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

HMM of driver intentions.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 3.

Elements in the HMMs of driver intentions.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 9.

Pedal velocity discretizing results.

(a) Release the accelerator pedal. (b) Hit the brake pedal. (c) Release the brake pedal.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 4.

Corresponding relationship between observed states and pedal velocities.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 10.

Hierarchical analysis model of driver intentions.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 5.

Trained parameters of the HMMs.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 11.

Recognition results of driver intentions.

(a) Sample 1; (b) Sample 2; (c) Sample 3.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Overall control architecture.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Relationship between brake pedal travel and target clamping force.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Reference current waveform.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Simulation results of the clamping force response performance.

(a) Clamping force. (b) Motor current. (c) Motor torque. (d) Motor speed.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Simulation results of the clamping force follow–up performance.

(a) Clamping force. (b) Motor speed.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 6.

Parameters of control algorithm.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 17.

Simulation result 1 of the clamping control strategy.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Simulation result 2 of the clamping control strategy.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Simulation result 3 of the clamping control strategy.

(a) Clamping force control. (b) Comparison of control effects: with and without pre-elimination brake clearance, and with and without CE.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Table 7.

Simulation results.

More »

Table 7 Expand